EMIL 

FRANZI 

Give 'em a reason not to vote for the other guy

December 6, 2006


RECENT FRANZI:

Conscription anathema to a free society

A chronicle of cluelessness, post Nov. 7

What we can take from the election

Six basic views of the war in Iraq

Graf, GOP gave CD8 to Giffords

Three cheers for John Philip Sousa

The insider's take on 18 ballot props

PRINCIPLE VERSUS PRECEDENT

Parsing the state ballot propositions

How not to run a campaign for office

Why voters vote for a candidate

Oro Valley's hidden agenda?

Inside Track: Franzi prognosticates the primary

Searching for the NW's political stalker

A tale of political pariahs

Annexation is a shabby process

RINO is not synonymous with liberal Republican

There is no such thing as free money

If only more pundits were more like Mike

Election may end D26's RINO days

Whose side are the two Times on?

More handicapping of primary elections

Coulter no worse than her attackers

The inside track on September 12

The Western is dead, will it rise again?

Whining, from the left and right

Voting lottery an insult to voting rights

Harry was right to drop the A-bomb

Ethics training for public officials?

Don't reward people too lazy to vote  

Ain't no room for Right in AZ schools

The inside track on the May election

More bipartisan immigration myths

You can't run government like a business

In requiem: Hannibal Franzi, 1988? - 2006

Getting real on voting fraud

Decrying pathological egalitariansim

Bring back partisan local elections  

Why it's called 'Inside Track'

Italian-American cultural history 101

Dispelling illegal immigration myths

The sky will not fall; vote 'No' on Question 2

SOME THOUGHTS ON ISRAEL  (pre-Iraq invasion)

The road to nowhere

Bemoaning vote-at-home

Beware liberal boogy men

The rising cost of politics

Talk radio myths

Another stab at decrying policy by bureaucracy

Bet on Latas as the Democrat Dark Horse

The tail wags the dog in local government

Handicapping the CD8 Democratic race

Handicapping the GOP race to replace Kolbe

Cowardly town manager vote puts Sweet in a tight box

Miers sunk Miers' nomination, not the 'Extreme Right'

Chris Limberis: Reporter

When it comes to poverty, look at who's exploiting who

Column critics wrong

Democracy ain't the same everywhere

Save a buck, let 'em vote

A wildcat misnomer

 

December 6, 2006 - Every election cycle we hear complaints about negative campaigns. Some, ignorant of the First Amendment, wish them controlled and regulated. There are always candidates, usually novices and often liberals, who find moral superiority in declaring they refuse to "go negative." What they usually find is not enough votes.

All political campaigns from constable to President have four components. Let them know you're running, give them a reason to vote for you, give them a reason to vote against the opponent, and identify your voter and get them to the polls. Please note part three.

 

Many people confuse it with a "smear" campaign. The line between the two is a simple one - truth.

Candidates squeamish about bringing up the attitudes and alliances of their opponent will be of little use to the cause or party they claim to represent if elected. They already indicate ignorance of the process and a priggish sense of righteousness, neither of which are useful attributes.

How do you have anything but a negative campaign against a ballot proposition? How hard is it to transfer running against a bad idea to running against somebody who has them? Beyond that, what about an opponent's personal competence or aptitude for public service?

A stunning local example is State Senator-elect Charlene Pesqueira. The lady was a no-show for many events, ignored repeated attempts by the media and others to contact her, and worst of all, had never voted before in her life.

It was a personal record that cried for exposure and both her opponent and the media failed in telling voters that she was an unqualified flake unfit for public office. She is living proof that negative campaigns and statements are not only necessary but that we don't have enough of them.

Courtesy of the great William Safire's "Lend me your ears," here are a few outstanding examples of political negativity that date back to the cradle of democracy in ancient Greece.

Desmosthenes

"I will come to the direct charges against your character. You espoused such a line of politics (when at last you thought of taking to them) that, if your country prospered, you lived the life of a hare, fearing and trembling and ever expecting to be scourged of the crimes of which your conscience accused you ..."

Patrick Henry

"Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation ...We must fight!

Theodore Roosevelt

"The timid man, the lazy man, the man who distrusts his country, the overcivilized man, who has lost the great fighting, masterful virtues, the ignorant man, and the man of dull mind, whose soul is incapable of feeling the mighty lift that thrills 'stern men with empires in their brains' - all these, of course, shrink from seeing the nation undertake it's new duties."

Harry Truman

"Some people say I ought not to talk so much about the Republican Eightieth 'do-nothing' Congress in this campaign. I will tell you why I will talk about it. If two-thirds of the people stay at home on election day as they did in 1946, and if we get another Republican Congress like the Eightieth Congress, it will be controlled by the same men ... who passed the Taft-Hartley Act, the rich man's tax bill, and took Social Security away from a million workers."

Lloyd Bentsen

"I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy."

Finally, one of the most negative documents in history is The Declaration of Independence. There are 32 paragraphs. Paragraphs three to 30 outline how bad King and Parliament are and what they've done wrong.

Illumination of opposition faults is clearly the American way.


 


BACK TO TOP


EMIL FRANZI

EMAIL FRANZI

BUT WATCH WHAT YOU SAY!

About Emil Franzi

Emil Franzi is the owner and host of "Inside Track" on KVOI - 690AM and KAPR - 930AM in Douglas.  The program airs on Saturdays from 12 pm till 5 pm.

Franzi currently writes a weekly column for the EXPLORER (formerly the NORTHWEST EXPLORER). He filled the TUCSON WEEKLY with close to a million relevant words from 1993 to 2004 and was an OpEd regular with the Az Daily Star from 1994 to 1998. His writing has also appeared in PHOENIX Magazine, ARIZONA HIGHWAYS, and the late CITY MAGAZINE in Tucson.

But then, Franzi is an iconoclast.

This website is Franzi's baby, put together with work, faith, and a little help from his friends, like Tom Danehy, Joyce Downey and Mike Tully.  The concept -- politics, books, humor, the Old West, movies, "Pet Talk" and letters -- is Emil's.  This unique brew seems to work.  This website averages more than a thousand "hits" a day and keeps growing.

You can read Emil Franzi's views on all things political and cultural, as well as opposing views, on our "Politics and More" page.