Give 'em a
reason not to vote for the other guy
December 6, 2006
RECENT FRANZI:
Conscription anathema to a
free society
A chronicle of cluelessness,
post Nov. 7
What we can
take from the election
Six basic
views of the war in Iraq
Graf, GOP gave CD8 to
Giffords
Three cheers for John
Philip Sousa
The insider's take on 18
ballot props
PRINCIPLE VERSUS PRECEDENT
Parsing the state ballot
propositions
How not to run a campaign
for office
Why voters vote for a
candidate
Oro Valley's hidden agenda?
Inside Track: Franzi
prognosticates the primary
Searching for the NW's
political stalker
A tale of political pariahs
Annexation is a shabby
process
RINO is not synonymous with
liberal Republican
There is no such thing as
free money
If only more pundits were
more like Mike
Election may end D26's RINO
days
Whose side are the two
Times on?
More
handicapping of primary elections
Coulter no worse than her
attackers
The inside
track on September 12
The Western is
dead, will it rise again?
Whining, from
the left and right
Voting lottery
an insult to voting rights
Harry was
right to drop the A-bomb
Ethics training for public
officials?
Don't reward people too
lazy to vote
Ain't no room for Right in
AZ schools
The inside track on the May
election
More bipartisan immigration
myths
You can't run government
like a business
In requiem: Hannibal Franzi,
1988? - 2006
Getting real on voting fraud
Decrying pathological
egalitariansim
Bring back partisan local
elections
Why
it's called 'Inside Track'
Italian-American cultural
history 101
Dispelling illegal
immigration myths
The sky will not fall; vote
'No' on Question 2
SOME THOUGHTS ON
ISRAEL (pre-Iraq invasion)
The road to
nowhere
Bemoaning vote-at-home
Beware liberal
boogy men
The rising cost of
politics
Talk radio
myths
Another stab at
decrying policy by bureaucracy
Bet on Latas as
the Democrat Dark Horse
The tail wags the dog in local
government
Handicapping
the CD8 Democratic race
Handicapping
the GOP race to replace Kolbe
Cowardly town
manager vote puts Sweet in a tight box
Miers sunk Miers' nomination, not
the 'Extreme Right'
Chris Limberis:
Reporter
When it comes to poverty, look at
who's exploiting who
Column critics
wrong
Democracy ain't
the same everywhere
Save a buck,
let 'em vote
A wildcat
misnomer
|
December 6,
2006 - Every election cycle we hear complaints about negative
campaigns. Some, ignorant of the First Amendment, wish them
controlled and regulated. There are always candidates, usually
novices and often liberals, who find moral superiority in
declaring they refuse to "go negative." What they usually find
is not enough votes.
All political campaigns from constable to President have four
components. Let them know you're running, give them a reason
to vote for you, give them a reason to vote against the
opponent, and identify your voter and get them to the polls.
Please note part three.
Many people confuse it with a
"smear" campaign. The line between the two is a simple one -
truth.
Candidates squeamish about bringing
up the attitudes and alliances of their opponent will be of
little use to the cause or party they claim to represent if
elected. They already indicate ignorance of the process and a
priggish sense of righteousness, neither of which are useful
attributes.
How do you have anything but a negative campaign against a
ballot proposition? How hard is it to transfer running against
a bad idea to running against somebody who has them? Beyond
that, what about an opponent's personal competence or aptitude
for public service?
A stunning local example is State Senator-elect Charlene
Pesqueira. The lady was a no-show for many events, ignored
repeated attempts by the media and others to contact her, and
worst of all, had never voted before in her life.
It was a personal record that cried for exposure and both her
opponent and the media failed in telling voters that she was
an unqualified flake unfit for public office. She is living
proof that negative campaigns and statements are not only
necessary but that we don't have enough of them.
Courtesy of the great William Safire's "Lend me your ears,"
here are a few outstanding examples of political negativity
that date back to the cradle of democracy in ancient Greece.
Desmosthenes
"I will come to the direct charges against your character. You
espoused such a line of politics (when at last you thought of
taking to them) that, if your country prospered, you lived the
life of a hare, fearing and trembling and ever expecting to be
scourged of the crimes of which your conscience accused you
..."
Patrick Henry
"Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have
produced additional violence and insult; our supplications
have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with
contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these
things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and
reconciliation ...We must fight!
Theodore Roosevelt
"The timid man, the lazy man, the man who distrusts his
country, the overcivilized man, who has lost the great
fighting, masterful virtues, the ignorant man, and the man of
dull mind, whose soul is incapable of feeling the mighty lift
that thrills 'stern men with empires in their brains' - all
these, of course, shrink from seeing the nation undertake it's
new duties."
Harry Truman
"Some people say I ought not to talk so much about the
Republican Eightieth 'do-nothing' Congress in this campaign. I
will tell you why I will talk about it. If two-thirds of the
people stay at home on election day as they did in 1946, and
if we get another Republican Congress like the Eightieth
Congress, it will be controlled by the same men ... who passed
the Taft-Hartley Act, the rich man's tax bill, and took Social
Security away from a million workers."
Lloyd Bentsen
"I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy
was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy."
Finally, one of the most negative documents in history is The
Declaration of Independence. There are 32 paragraphs.
Paragraphs three to 30 outline how bad King and Parliament are
and what they've done wrong.
Illumination of opposition faults is clearly the American way.
BACK
TO TOP
|
EMIL FRANZI EMAIL
FRANZI

BUT WATCH
WHAT YOU SAY!
|