EMIL 

FRANZI 

Fixing government's 'functional breakdown'

April 4, 2007


RECENT FRANZI:

Three local elections to keep your eyes on

Elected officials perfectly at ease on sidelines

Recounting my three biggest blunders

Some aren't worth minimum wage

Pathology and porn at the local library

Inside Track: Marana faces some imperfect options

Inside Track: Wealthy people have to live someplace

Inside Track: The nanny state will now address - annoyance

Why 'consensus' is a dangerous concept

Why can't Republicans just say 'No?'

Dumb political clichès

Check back in ’08 to see how it turns out

My own Iraq study group

A handful of holiday opinions

Real GOP doesn't use elections welfare

Give 'em a reason not to vote for the other guy

Conscription anathema to a free society

A chronicle of cluelessness, post Nov. 7

What we can take from the election

Six basic views of the war in Iraq

Graf, GOP gave CD8 to Giffords

Three cheers for John Philip Sousa

The insider's take on 18 ballot props

PRINCIPLE VERSUS PRECEDENT

Parsing the state ballot propositions

How not to run a campaign for office

Why voters vote for a candidate

Oro Valley's hidden agenda?

Inside Track: Franzi prognosticates the primary

Searching for the NW's political stalker

A tale of political pariahs

Annexation is a shabby process

RINO is not synonymous with liberal Republican

There is no such thing as free money

If only more pundits were more like Mike

Election may end D26's RINO days

Whose side are the two Times on?

More handicapping of primary elections

Coulter no worse than her attackers

The inside track on September 12

The Western is dead, will it rise again?

Whining, from the left and right

Voting lottery an insult to voting rights

Harry was right to drop the A-bomb

Ethics training for public officials?

Don't reward people too lazy to vote  

Ain't no room for Right in AZ schools

The inside track on the May election

More bipartisan immigration myths

You can't run government like a business

In requiem: Hannibal Franzi, 1988? - 2006

Getting real on voting fraud

Decrying pathological egalitariansim

Bring back partisan local elections  

Why it's called 'Inside Track'

Italian-American cultural history 101

Dispelling illegal immigration myths

The sky will not fall; vote 'No' on Question 2

SOME THOUGHTS ON ISRAEL  (pre-Iraq invasion)

The road to nowhere

Bemoaning vote-at-home

Beware liberal boogy men

The rising cost of politics

Talk radio myths

Another stab at decrying policy by bureaucracy

Bet on Latas as the Democrat Dark Horse

The tail wags the dog in local government

Handicapping the CD8 Democratic race

Handicapping the GOP race to replace Kolbe

Cowardly town manager vote puts Sweet in a tight box

Miers sunk Miers' nomination, not the 'Extreme Right'

Chris Limberis: Reporter

When it comes to poverty, look at who's exploiting who

Column critics wrong

Democracy ain't the same everywhere

Save a buck, let 'em vote

A wildcat misnomer

 

Complaints about the loss of American democracy are common. Many see the present administration as a power hungry group stomping on ancient rights. Others saw the last administration similarly. Some view both and most of their predecessors as all ratcheting up control.

Many arguments about expanding federal power are cogent, but the debate has been going on since Jefferson and Hamilton. The overall effect has been minimal compared to the genuine erosion of representative government at all levels that has occurred over the past few decades.

We are not a democracy, we are a republic with representative government. We choose our leaders and they call the shots. And we’ve been making it harder for them to function as our representatives for years.

Our attitude is schizoid. We trash politicians in general forgetting they reflect we who chose them. The cop-out is mush from both left and right, claiming either corporate dominance or blaming the media. Some believe this produces a lower grade of elected official. One clear result is elected officials who more closely resemble student government than genuine governance.

The following examples of this functional breakdown were all reported just last week:


-State Representative Jonathan Paton, (one of the brightest by the way) will chair hearings in the legislature concerning Arizona Child Protective Services. The hearings will be closed to the public because by law CP cases must be kept private. Legislators may review them, but they can’t talk about them.

Why not? The law clearly benefits the bureaucracy that may have blundered more than it benefits those the bureaucracy blundered in not protecting. There could be discussion of the issues in a specific case without naming anyone. Our representatives can’t discuss this with us because, no doubt heavily lobbied by the multitude of government lobbyists on state and local payrolls, they abdicated their responsibility to us by restricting themselves.


-From the Interior Department a wire story that one of the “political” appointees was “leaking” information about proposed regulations to the businesses proposed to be regulated.

Had a career bureaucrat done so to environmental groups, they’d be called “whistle blower.”

Unfortunately, there aren’t enough political appointees —  those chosen by somebody who won an election - to control the herds of bureaucrats at all levels who have their own agendas never submitted to any form of voter review.


-In Chicago, a high level official was indicted for helping fix City jobs. The heat has been on the old machine so big that I’m told someone actually got a high-end post by simply applying. “We don’t want nobody nobody sent” will now be replaced by the National Search and gypsy bureaucrats. The power again moved from those beholden to those elected to the Catberts in Human Resources, who will now manipulate the process for THEIR cronies.


-The Legislature attempted to open the process involving who got the lucrative contracts for traffic schools. Currently they’re picked by local courts. The Legislature wanted more competition by giving those ticketed a choice on which outfit. The courts, with media support, complained and gave all the usual pro-monopoly arguments. Nowhere in all this did I hear “competitive bid.”


-An initiative passed forbidding the Legislature from altering any measure passed by initiative. Voters last year passed a minimum wage initiative that failed to exempt organizations hiring the disabled. The AG maintained there was no way the Legislature could legally fix this problem, which tells you restricting them was a stupid idea in the first place. It got fixed by allowing the State Industrial Commission to arbitrarily redefine “employment.”

Follow closely. Your elected representatives may not alter any dumb idea the voters pass, but an unelected body can by a total stretch of their imagination.

No one of these is earthshaking, but connect the dots and you’ll see a small part of the extended path to political impotency for those we elect with a commensurate accrual of power by those we don’t.


 

 


BACK TO TOP


EMIL FRANZI

EMAIL FRANZI

BUT WATCH WHAT YOU SAY!

About Emil Franzi

Emil Franzi is the owner and host of "Inside Track" on KVOI - 690AM and KAPR - 930AM in Douglas.  The program airs on Saturdays from 12 pm till 5 pm.

Franzi currently writes a weekly column for the EXPLORER (formerly the NORTHWEST EXPLORER). He filled the TUCSON WEEKLY with close to a million relevant words from 1993 to 2004 and was an OpEd regular with the Az Daily Star from 1994 to 1998. His writing has also appeared in PHOENIX Magazine, ARIZONA HIGHWAYS, and the late CITY MAGAZINE in Tucson.

But then, Franzi is an iconoclast.

This website is Franzi's baby, put together with work, faith, and a little help from his friends, like Tom Danehy, Joyce Downey and Mike Tully.  The concept -- politics, books, humor, the Old West, movies, "Pet Talk" and letters -- is Emil's.  This unique brew seems to work.  This website averages more than a thousand "hits" a day and keeps growing.

You can read Emil Franzi's views on all things political and cultural, as well as opposing views, on our "Politics and More" page.