EMIL 

FRANZI 

Best political leadership comes from center

July 4, 2007


RECENT FRANZI:

Let's get back to real representation

When did supervisors become onlookers?

Az. GOP 'hang tough,' not hang each other

'Re-defining' the immigration debate

Culling the GOP's presidential herd

You pick them; they don't pick you

Marana's 'good ol' boy' days soon to end

MCCAIN RECONSIDERED

Reactions to Imus' demise raise bigger issues

produces myths, postures

Fixing government's 'functional breakdown'

Three local elections to keep your eyes on

Elected officials perfectly at ease on sidelines

Recounting my three biggest blunders

Some aren't worth minimum wage

Pathology and porn at the local library

Inside Track: Marana faces some imperfect options

Inside Track: Wealthy people have to live someplace

Inside Track: The nanny state will now address - annoyance

Why 'consensus' is a dangerous concept

Why can't Republicans just say 'No?'

Dumb political clichès

Check back in ’08 to see how it turns out

My own Iraq study group

A handful of holiday opinions

Real GOP doesn't use elections welfare

Give 'em a reason not to vote for the other guy

Conscription anathema to a free society

A chronicle of cluelessness, post Nov. 7

What we can take from the election

Six basic views of the war in Iraq

Graf, GOP gave CD8 to Giffords

Three cheers for John Philip Sousa

The insider's take on 18 ballot props

PRINCIPLE VERSUS PRECEDENT

Parsing the state ballot propositions

How not to run a campaign for office

Why voters vote for a candidate

Oro Valley's hidden agenda?

Inside Track: Franzi prognosticates the primary

Searching for the NW's political stalker

A tale of political pariahs

Annexation is a shabby process

RINO is not synonymous with liberal Republican

There is no such thing as free money

If only more pundits were more like Mike

Election may end D26's RINO days

Whose side are the two Times on?

More handicapping of primary elections

Coulter no worse than her attackers

The inside track on September 12

The Western is dead, will it rise again?

Whining, from the left and right

Voting lottery an insult to voting rights

Harry was right to drop the A-bomb

Ethics training for public officials?

Don't reward people too lazy to vote  

Ain't no room for Right in AZ schools

The inside track on the May election

More bipartisan immigration myths

You can't run government like a business

In requiem: Hannibal Franzi, 1988? - 2006

Getting real on voting fraud

Decrying pathological egalitariansim

Bring back partisan local elections  

Why it's called 'Inside Track'

Italian-American cultural history 101

Dispelling illegal immigration myths

The sky will not fall; vote 'No' on Question 2

SOME THOUGHTS ON ISRAEL  (pre-Iraq invasion)

The road to nowhere

Bemoaning vote-at-home

Beware liberal boogy men

The rising cost of politics

Talk radio myths

Another stab at decrying policy by bureaucracy

Bet on Latas as the Democrat Dark Horse

The tail wags the dog in local government

Handicapping the CD8 Democratic race

Handicapping the GOP race to replace Kolbe

Cowardly town manager vote puts Sweet in a tight box

Miers sunk Miers' nomination, not the 'Extreme Right'

Chris Limberis: Reporter

When it comes to poverty, look at who's exploiting who

Column critics wrong

Democracy ain't the same everywhere

Save a buck, let 'em vote

A wildcat misnomer

 

Liberals once perceived a sure thing going on almost every front against docile Republicans — think Gerry Ford who gave us Justice John Paul Stevens. Conservative voices were minimal, one George Will was enough for Brinkley on Sunday morning. The election of Ronald Reagan and a host of new conservative faces to both houses of Congress were considered just a temporary setback. Even the Gingrich revolution in 1994 wasn’t looked upon as permanent.

There’s a basic epistemological reason for this. Liberals generally believe in trends that are beyond diversion by mere human endeavor. That series of conservative victories were just annoying setbacks. To many liberals it was just a matter of time before America got back on the left track.

What this innately arrogant form of determinism fails to take into account is the constant movement of the political center based on a number of factors mostly caused by individual human choice and endeavor. This is the fundamental philosophical difference between most of the left and right. They’re determinist. We’re not.

The center moves and has in general been moving right for 30 years. The two parties have re-aligned from a squishy center-right and dominant center-left  to temporary equilibrium with a basically conservative GOP and a Democratic center-left more left than center. Evidence is abundant when Rudy Giuliani is the “liberal” Republican, the last known real Democrat conservative was Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman is the only  Scoop Jackson Democrat left.

Voting and governance decline when parties and candidates appear similar, which is why I advocate the politics of polarization. What we may lose in civility is made up for in clarity. This is an excellent time to re-read the Declaration of Independence, which is a classic example of polarization.  America began with a negative campaign.

Our national parties are different from fifty years ago but more like those in the 19th century. Those who haven’t caught on to that will join the losers. Democrats must first appeal to their base as Republicans must first appeal to theirs. Nothing new that Tammany Hall and Henry Clay didn’t grasp long ago. The same applies to state parties which will vary according to demographics, culture and personalities.

Arizona has a reasonably representative method of choosing party leaders. Directly elected precinct committee people choose local party officers who choose state leaders and write party platforms.

Local Democrats have tacked left for some time, local Republicans are moving right.  A left-leaning media ( know any center-right local columnists besides me?) and a big university helps tilt the electorate and many local Republicans, like the national party, played Step’n Fetchit to them for too many years. Many still do, which hasn’t helped them win many elections. “Me too” only works when the enemy is already wounded.

But the center has shifted,  measured  by counting the number of yahoos on both sides pulling on that center. The recent immigration debate illustrated that both sides have their share, but the rightees were far more numerous on this one. They ranged from mostly intelligent opponents of a flawed piece of legislation to those who’s knuckles leave grooves in the carpet. How far the GOP center moved is indicated in the tumult that descended on Sen. Jon Kyl. Checking the blogs, many who cannot even spell his name want him “impeached or something,” indicating a failing grade in Gov’t 101.

While competent extremists are preferable to inept and timid moderates, those near the CURRENT center are the best shot for leadership in both parties. How well they handle their own bozos and loudmouths will be a major factor in future elections.

Sen. Kyl has served 20 years in both Houses of Congress. The American Conservative Union gives him a lifetime voting index of 97 percent. Test for those wanting him removed and calling him “traitor”: I have 100 questions for you. Better not miss more than three.


BACK TO TOP


EMIL FRANZI

EMAIL FRANZI

BUT WATCH WHAT YOU SAY!

About Emil Franzi

Emil Franzi is the owner and host of "Inside Track" on KVOI - 690AM and KAPR - 930AM in Douglas.  The program airs on Saturdays from 12 pm till 5 pm.

Franzi currently writes a weekly column for the EXPLORER (formerly the NORTHWEST EXPLORER). He filled the TUCSON WEEKLY with close to a million relevant words from 1993 to 2004 and was an OpEd regular with the Az Daily Star from 1994 to 1998. His writing has also appeared in PHOENIX Magazine, ARIZONA HIGHWAYS, and the late CITY MAGAZINE in Tucson.

But then, Franzi is an iconoclast.

This website is Franzi's baby, put together with work, faith, and a little help from his friends, like Tom Danehy, Joyce Downey and Mike Tully.  The concept -- politics, books, humor, the Old West, movies, "Pet Talk" and letters -- is Emil's.  This unique brew seems to work.  This website averages more than a thousand "hits" a day and keeps growing.

You can read Emil Franzi's views on all things political and cultural, as well as opposing views, on our "Politics and More" page.