EMIL 

FRANZI 

Inside Track: Wealthy people have to live someplace

February 7, 2007


RECENT FRANZI:

Inside Track: The nanny state will now address - annoyance

Why 'consensus' is a dangerous concept

Why can't Republicans just say 'No?'

Dumb political clichès

Check back in ’08 to see how it turns out

My own Iraq study group

A handful of holiday opinions

Real GOP doesn't use elections welfare

Give 'em a reason not to vote for the other guy

Conscription anathema to a free society

A chronicle of cluelessness, post Nov. 7

What we can take from the election

Six basic views of the war in Iraq

Graf, GOP gave CD8 to Giffords

Three cheers for John Philip Sousa

The insider's take on 18 ballot props

PRINCIPLE VERSUS PRECEDENT

Parsing the state ballot propositions

How not to run a campaign for office

Why voters vote for a candidate

Oro Valley's hidden agenda?

Inside Track: Franzi prognosticates the primary

Searching for the NW's political stalker

A tale of political pariahs

Annexation is a shabby process

RINO is not synonymous with liberal Republican

There is no such thing as free money

If only more pundits were more like Mike

Election may end D26's RINO days

Whose side are the two Times on?

More handicapping of primary elections

Coulter no worse than her attackers

The inside track on September 12

The Western is dead, will it rise again?

Whining, from the left and right

Voting lottery an insult to voting rights

Harry was right to drop the A-bomb

Ethics training for public officials?

Don't reward people too lazy to vote  

Ain't no room for Right in AZ schools

The inside track on the May election

More bipartisan immigration myths

You can't run government like a business

In requiem: Hannibal Franzi, 1988? - 2006

Getting real on voting fraud

Decrying pathological egalitariansim

Bring back partisan local elections  

Why it's called 'Inside Track'

Italian-American cultural history 101

Dispelling illegal immigration myths

The sky will not fall; vote 'No' on Question 2

SOME THOUGHTS ON ISRAEL  (pre-Iraq invasion)

The road to nowhere

Bemoaning vote-at-home

Beware liberal boogy men

The rising cost of politics

Talk radio myths

Another stab at decrying policy by bureaucracy

Bet on Latas as the Democrat Dark Horse

The tail wags the dog in local government

Handicapping the CD8 Democratic race

Handicapping the GOP race to replace Kolbe

Cowardly town manager vote puts Sweet in a tight box

Miers sunk Miers' nomination, not the 'Extreme Right'

Chris Limberis: Reporter

When it comes to poverty, look at who's exploiting who

Column critics wrong

Democracy ain't the same everywhere

Save a buck, let 'em vote

A wildcat misnomer

 

February 7, 2007

One question continually raised in local elections is that of “affordable housing.” This was best exemplified at the recent Marana candidate forum sponsored by this newspaper where we witnessed all four council challengers (the two incumbents were absent) and the two mayoral candidates endorse the concept with few specifics between them.

While some found it a bad thing that many Marana residents can’t afford a new home, it seemed that most didn’t want to pursue the matter in depth probably because the majority of those currently voting in Marana can already afford to live there and aren’t that concerned about the issue. In fact, many like the rising value of the homes they bought. As a resident of unincorporated Pima County, I often visit friends in other parts of the county —Tucson Country Club Estates comes to mind — where I can’t afford even an older home and it really doesn’t bother me at all. I suspect most Maranans and other folks feel similarly. Rich people gotta live somewhere.

Marana is typical of most  smaller American communities in the burgeoning sunbelt where the issue of affordable housing is worth deeper exploration beyond cheering Habitat for Humanity, though they may have problems getting their stuff past all the CC and R’s in most subdivisions. Beyond that, there are many things local communities can do to make housing more affordable.

• Keep taxes low. Oro Valley and Marana as yet have no property tax and many council people in both towns pledge to keep it that way. But inventing other ways to slam residents by charging a utility tax raises the cost of housing too. Best way to keep housing affordable is quit spending so much on the non-essentials all current town councils seem enamored with.

• Join Pima County and the City of Tucson with a  Section 8 Housing program where low income folks get subsidized rent in scattered locations in privately owned homes and apartments. This doesn’t lower the cost of housing, it merely subsidizes it and would require additional bureaucracy and more taxes somewhere and ultimately raising overall housing costs slightly.

• Build public housing. While generally considered a tragic blunder in most big cities, perhaps a smaller version might work. Again, the tax revenues needed would probably raise the cost of other houses making them less affordable.

• Support more manufactured housing. Not just the nice ones, but also the kind mass produced in Asia and resembling large cargo containers with windows and plumbing. Safe, healthy cheap and ugly but beats sleeping under the bridge — unless you happen to like sleeping under bridges better.

• Reducing regulations. Many of the laws and rules homebuilders must comply with are not particularly useful, nor do they contribute to health and safety. Builders just pass on the costs. Eliminate some of those and reduce the real cost of new homes.

Only one problem with most of the above: It’s highly doubtful that existing residents who mostly live under the often draconian rules of their HOA’s would vote for any candidate who supported them. People concerned that a mailbox color will reduce the value of their home probably won’t want a large habitable container anywhere near them, let alone a $100,000 triplewide.

Further, the bureaucracy will continue to justify every comma in the building code and invent whole new paragraphs and sub-sections. City councils everywhere are generally helpless when it comes to controlling them and continually acquiesce to whatever.

There will also be pressure from the well-meaning for items like making every new home senior- and disabled- friendly, the unintended consequences of which are incrementally pricing a few more seniors and disabled out of purchasing the house in the first place.

That’s a quick grab-bag of ideas on the subject from no particular perspective put out to stimulate discussion. I fully expect all the candidates in both local towns to avoid almost all of them.
 


BACK TO TOP


EMIL FRANZI

EMAIL FRANZI

BUT WATCH WHAT YOU SAY!

About Emil Franzi

Emil Franzi is the owner and host of "Inside Track" on KVOI - 690AM and KAPR - 930AM in Douglas.  The program airs on Saturdays from 12 pm till 5 pm.

Franzi currently writes a weekly column for the EXPLORER (formerly the NORTHWEST EXPLORER). He filled the TUCSON WEEKLY with close to a million relevant words from 1993 to 2004 and was an OpEd regular with the Az Daily Star from 1994 to 1998. His writing has also appeared in PHOENIX Magazine, ARIZONA HIGHWAYS, and the late CITY MAGAZINE in Tucson.

But then, Franzi is an iconoclast.

This website is Franzi's baby, put together with work, faith, and a little help from his friends, like Tom Danehy, Joyce Downey and Mike Tully.  The concept -- politics, books, humor, the Old West, movies, "Pet Talk" and letters -- is Emil's.  This unique brew seems to work.  This website averages more than a thousand "hits" a day and keeps growing.

You can read Emil Franzi's views on all things political and cultural, as well as opposing views, on our "Politics and More" page.